Jeremy Goldstein is an attorney practicing law in New York City. Jeremy has a lot of first-hand experience about what it takes to have viable economic conditions for corporations. It has been a challenging task for investors and employees. Incentives have proven to be a hard nut to crack, and Jeremy Goldstein offers counsel on how to deal with using Earnings Per Share. Also, Jeremy gives his perception of the topic of other incentive-based programs and how they are used in pay based on performance. Earnings Per Share(EPS) have a significant influence in creating viable economic conditions for corporations.
EPS influences the stock price a great deal, and this is a good thing for shareholders. It is the driving force and motivation for buying and selling shares. Also, it contributes to the incentive for firms to raise the pay for each employee. According to studies conducted recently, companies that have included EPS in their payment have proven to be more successful. When coming up with a business plan EPS looks like an advantageous system. On the other hand, due to the aggressive attributes of shares and trading industry, this can provide a platform for individuals to use EPS unfairly.
Those opposing the adoption of EPS in companies have stated that it contributes to inequity. Moreover, they are of the belief that EPS does not offer corporate control. Instead, it gives corporate executives powers over whether or not the measures satisfy EPS hence providing inaccurate results. These incorrect results could drive up share sales, and this would be both misleading and illegal. Others opposing these measures argue that their profits are only short-term hence cannot provide stable continuous economic conditions for corporations. Furthermore, programs for pay by performance have been known to give inaccurate results, and it has been worrying to use EPS to reinforce stock exchange. Opposers suggest that firms that invest in long-term objectives instead of short-term objectives, in the long run, will work their way around making the value of their shares stronger.
Jeremy Goldstein is on balance with pay on performance-based programs. He recommends that these programs such as EPS should not be done away. On the contrary, corporate executives should be held accountable for their actions. The pay based on performance should be in line with long-term objectives of the organization. This will ensure long-term sustainable economic growth and growth of shares on a controlled scale.
Jeremy Goldstein has a Juris Doctor degree from New York University School of Law. He has been in the law practice in New York for several years. He worked for a large firm but eventually broke off to form his firm, Jeremy L. Goldstein, and Associates, LLC. He has worked cases with big companies such as Bank of America. He deals with matters of the legality of money and compensations.
Jeremy is a writer of numerous journals about law and provides advice about legal matters. He is a representative of the professional advisory board and contributes to the NYU Journal of Law and Business. Jeremy chairs the Mergers and Acquisitions Committee of the Executive Compensation Committee. Jeremy contributes to the front house and goes out of his way to help people suffering from mental illness. According to the Legal 500 and the Chambers USA Guide to America’s Leading Lawyers for Business, Jeremy Goldstein has been listed among the top attorney of choice for matters concerning legal advice. Learn more: http://officialjeremygoldstein.com/